All features

AI Orchestration & Compliance

AI you can audit, not AI you have to trust.

The question a search firm should ask about AI is not whether it is impressive but whether its output can be defended six months later. RayCruit treats AI as a governed capability: every output checked, every call logged, every downstream artefact aware of when its source changed.

  • Every output checked against a fixed structure before it is shown
  • Versioned prompts with provider and model recorded
  • Automatic staleness flags on dependent artefacts
  • Per-action routing across four providers without redeploy
Placement · Evaluation
AI evaluation workbench in the Placement Workspace showing six analyses — detailed suitability, strengths and gaps, interview questions, risk assessment and recruiter positioning — each with its freshness state.

The problem

Ungoverned AI creates work that cannot be defended.

A recruiter pasting a CV into a chat window gets a useful summary and creates four problems: nobody knows which model produced it, nobody can reproduce it, it silently overwrote the recruiter's own judgement, and when the CV is updated the summary stays wrong. In a regulated, client-facing business, that is not a productivity gain.

  • No record of which model, prompt or input produced a client-facing claim
  • Free-text output cannot be validated, so errors reach the client
  • AI output overwrites human assessment without anyone noticing
  • Artefacts go stale silently when the underlying CV or mandate changes

Every AI interaction structured, validated, logged and reversible.

AI in RayCruit is confined to well-defined actions with defined inputs and outputs in a fixed structure. That constraint is what makes it auditable.

01

Structured extraction

CVs and job ads are extracted into defined fields rather than summarised into prose, which is what makes the output checkable at all.

02

Every output is checked before you see it

Every AI output is checked against a fixed structure before it reaches a recruiter's screen. Anything that does not fit is not displayed.

03

Versioned prompts

Prompts are versioned artefacts. Any past output can be traced to the exact prompt version that produced it.

04

Provider and model logging

Every call records its provider, model, prompt version, input and output — and can be streamed live so administrators can watch the system work.

05

Staleness detection

Change a CV or a mandate and every dependent analysis, matrix and export flags itself for regeneration. No client receives a summary built on an outdated source.

06

No silent overwrite

AI fills blanks and proposes changes. It does not overwrite what a human wrote, and every suggestion is visibly a suggestion until accepted.

07

Human review by design

AI output is decision-support material. The workflow requires a person between generation and anything client-facing.

08

Multi-provider routing

RayCruit supports OpenAI, Anthropic, Google and Mistral, and any individual AI action can be routed to a different provider without a redeploy. The managed RayCruit service currently processes with Mistral AI in Europe — see the Privacy Policy for the current subprocessors.

09

Rules where it matters

The core match score is computed, not generated. AI is used for judgement-shaped tasks — risk, positioning, interview preparation — not for the number the shortlist is ranked on.

The lifecycle of one AI action

Every AI action in the platform follows the same governed path.

  1. 01

    Defined trigger

    A recruiter runs a specific action against specific structured input.

  2. 02

    Versioned prompt

    The action uses a versioned prompt routed to the configured provider and model.

  3. 03

    Structure check

    The response is checked against the expected structure before it is accepted.

  4. 04

    Review

    The output is presented as a suggestion for a person to accept, edit or discard.

  5. 05

    Dependency tracking

    If the source later changes, everything derived from it is flagged for regeneration.

How search firms use it

Client data-protection review

An enterprise client asking which models process their candidate data gets a specific, configurable answer.

Model policy

A firm that requires a particular provider for certain data routes those actions accordingly, without changing anything else.

Post-hoc investigation

When a client questions a claim in a submission, the logged prompt version and inputs make the answer reconstructable.

What changes

AI that passes review

Governance answers the questions procurement and legal actually ask.

No stale client material

Dependency tracking prevents the most damaging category of error.

Recruiter authority preserved

Human judgement stays authoritative by design, not by convention.

See it in motion

The platform, end to end, in two minutes.

How the modules hand over to each other in the real product — customer and mandate, candidate and matrix, the workspace where a pairing is decided, and the material that goes to the client.

2 min

See the modules working together.

A demo follows one mandate across every module, which is the only way the connections become obvious.